ES -- DX/CL -- isee -- cboe put/call -- specialist/public short ratio -- trinq -- trin -- aaii bull ratio -- abx -- cmbx -- cdx -- vxo p&f -- SPX volatility curve -- VIX:VXO skew -- commodity screen -- cot -- conference board

Thursday, February 17, 2005

 

judicial nominations


kos notes that the bush administration has renominated twenty failed nominees for the federal bench. the battle to push them through may be the death knell for the filibuster, the most potent weapon in the senate's minority arsenal. previously rejected by the senate amid hundreds of approvals as too ideological, the administration is apparently unwilling to concede to the senate the authority to refuse the imperial will.

the article i linked to above, from the center for individual freedom, advocates ending the filibuster with the following rationale:

The irony is that the very majoritarian rule suggested by the text of the Constitution is deemed "nuclear" by those who have sworn an oath to uphold "the supreme Law of the Land."
of course, this is an entirely too common recasting of history and the intent of the founders to serve current ideological expediencies. with the possible exception of jefferson, the founders feared democracy, as well we should -- for they had read their plato, and viewed majoritarian democracy as unstable, chaotic and ultimately tyrannical. they intentionally constructed the senate and the supreme court to be insensitive to the will of the mob and replete with conservative tradition and powerful weapons for the minority. the founders were english parliamentarians, not french revolutionaries. they read burke, not rousseau.

kos' comment:

Bush has never been interested in building concensus. Despite the best confirmation record in a generation, Bush refuses to brook even the mildest dissent.
i have to say, it is to be expected from here on out.


This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?