ES -- DX/CL -- isee -- cboe put/call -- specialist/public short ratio -- trinq -- trin -- aaii bull ratio -- abx -- cmbx -- cdx -- vxo p&f -- SPX volatility curve -- VIX:VXO skew -- commodity screen -- cot -- conference board

Monday, October 06, 2008

 

comprehensive deposit insurance


... is unlikely to change anything. paul kedrosky:

With Germany and Ireland now having more or less made explicit 100% guarantees for all deposits, many people are wondering who's next in the face of the current credit crisis. Will it be the U.S., which only has about 64% of deposits insured, even at the new $250,000 limits? (Note that some of this is high net-worth sorts, but much of it is interbank lines between foreign institutions and U.S. banks. In other words, if it decided to move, much of it could move in a hurry, neatly making the U.S. banks insolvent.)

My friend Nouriel Roubini argues that the U.S. needs to temporarily extend deposit insurance to all money on deposit with U.S. banks, thus negating the likelihood of a so-called silent bank run. Others point out that Japan tried precisely this during its banking crisis, and it had no impact -- the bank runs happened anyway as uninsured deposits from foreign counterparties scooted. I'm torn on this one, and I understand the argument, but without the some commitment to triage -- picking winners and losers among the banks -- this could quickly become a mess. And I am just not convinced that the FDIC and Treasury have reached the point where it wants to make that part of the eventual nationalization explicit yet. The latter will happen, and 't were better it happened sooner than later, but Paulson/Bernanke still seem to be fighting from the rear on this.


nationalizing the banks with the FDIC may yet come, but institutional money is what will make or break the western financial system. with interbank lending frozen solid, all that remains is for interbank deposits to be withdrawn -- uninsured banks running other banks in a last-ditch cascade into counterparty hell.

Labels: , ,



from Perrone -- GM, could you be a little more explicit about what exactly you mean when you talk about "institutional money" here? just whose money is it -- who will withdraw it?

 
------ ------- ------
sorry perrone -- i took some liberty with the word -- perhaps "non-individual" would be more accurate. the particular concern are deposits from overseas banks, insurers and pension funds.

 
------ ------- ------

Post a Comment

Hide comments


This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?